|
Considering the age of the house should we re-wire? 16 July 2005
A. Your home was built to be the most modern thing on the block back in the day when electricity was cheap (actually, factor inflation in and I think it’s still pretty cheap). The wiring and methods used at your house were “state of the art” and that being said I am confident that the wiring behind your walls is in good shape. It’s second generation Romex® flexible cable and was inspected by an electrical inspector when it wen t in. Because the builder was going for the upgraded electrical certification, I’m sure the electrician doing the job took pride in his work and that made the job better. With a 200 amps to the house, you have the size service that is still being put in houses the size of yours even to this day. If you want to confirm what is going on you can have the face of the panel box-- called the deadfront-- taken off and all of the connections examined. What would be searched for would be signs of overheating at the connections, water damage or anything that may have been done since installation that is out of the ordinary. Notice I didn’t say “out of code”. The electrical code is updated every three years and the code that your house was built under was pre-1960. I can tell that because you said you ’ve added three pronged outlets (grounded). They came into the code in about 1960. Many safety innovations have been incorporated into the code since your house was built such as smoke detectors and ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) for prescrib ed locations and I’d recommend upgrading for them. What can go wrong with the wiring in your house can go wrong in a house of any age-- even new. Things like a wiring cable getting damaged by a mis-driven nail or screw by someone mounting something to a wall or ceiling after the house is complete. A r odent-- including squirrels-- getting into an attic, crawl space, wall or basement and dining upon the wire’s insulation that can shock the critter and start a fire. That happens from time to time. A loose connection from a sloppily installed switch, pl ug, light, fan or any other device attached to the wiring system that can heat up because it’s loose, creating resistance to current flow. Outlets that get worn out due to numerous repeated usages-- such as the upper outlet of a duplex wall outlet in a c arpeted hallway or room where the vacuum cleaner gets plugged into time and time again and the outlet becomes loose-- again, causing resistance. Unless a wire gets physically damaged or overloaded it just doesn’t wear out because it’s old. Insulation can get brittle over time but even if it’s brittle it will be fine if it isn’t disturbed. It’s the points of connection where you can have trouble but if something is installed and connected properly there should be no problem. Pre-1940 wiring is often insufficient for today’s loads. We who have lived in older homes know that using the coffee maker and toaster at same time will send us to the bas ement to replace a blown fuse. To avoid that some folks will replace a blown fuse with one of higher amperage-- too high for that particular circuit and that’s how fires get started. Now, there is some merit to the argument that after a period of unknown or unspecified length even breakers can become unreliable due to age. They are mechanical devices that are designed to open a circuit in response to heat-- too much current draw on the device will heat it up to a point at which a bi-metal device trips and opens the circuit. Some have been known not to do that. Certain brands of circuit breakers have a better reputation than others. Electricians know. I once went into a house 25 years old that had two electrical panel boxes. The room I was standing in was lighted by overhead lights. I switched one box off and the lights stayed on. I switched the OTHER box off and the lights stayed on. Obviously th ere was a failure the likes of which would only show up should the current draw to the box exceed the box’s capacity and the main breaker would not switch open. The person determining that would be the fire investigator. The next time I went back to tha t house there were two new panels. If there are any “sleeping dogs” in this electrical system I’d start looking at the breakers. It might be prudent to call a licensed electrician to go over the box and render an opinion. It’s not very expensive to replace breakers one by one. The cost of replacing the whole distribution panel the size of yours and not increasing the service size-- because you don’t need to-- is in the $800 to $1000. range. |